From: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
Date: | 2006-04-27 15:19:36 |
Message-ID: | 28EEAFE6-22FA-4CC3-81BC-45E14CD530CA@khera.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Ron Peacetree wrote:
> ...and even if you do buy Intel, =DON"T= buy Dell unless you like
> causing trouble for yourself.
> Bad experiences with Dell in general and their poor PERC RAID
> controllers in specific are all over this and other DB forums.
I don't think that their current controllers suck like their older
ones did. That's what you'll read about in the archives -- the old
stuff. Eg, the 1850's embedded RAID controller really flies, but it
only works with the internal disks. I can't comment on the external
array controller for the 1850, but I cannot imagine it being any slower.
And personally, I've not experienced any major problems aside from
two bad PE1550's 4 years ago. And I have currently about 15 Dell
servers running 24x7x365 doing various tasks, including postgres.
However, my *big* databases always go on dual opteron boxes. my
current favorite is the SunFire X4100 with an external RAID.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-27 16:13:26 | Re: Firebird 1.5.3 X Postgresql 8.1.3 (linux Firebird 1.5.3 X Postgresql 8.1.3 (linux and and windows)] |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2006-04-27 15:11:42 | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |