From: | Jens-Wolfhard Schicke <ml+pgsql-performance(at)asco(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Christian Paul B(dot) Cosinas" <cpc(at)cybees(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Used Memory |
Date: | 2005-10-21 07:23:28 |
Message-ID: | 28EE02F5BBCA481B51C4E44E@[192.168.1.72] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
--On Freitag, Oktober 21, 2005 03:40:47 +0000 "Christian Paul B. Cosinas"
<cpc(at)cybees(dot)com> wrote:
> I am having a confusion to the memory handling of postgreSQL.
> I rebooted my Server which is a PostgreSQL 8.0 Running on Redhat 9, which
> is a Dual Xeon Server and 6 gig of memory.
>
> Of course there is not much memory still used since it is just restarted.
>
> But after a number of access to the tables the memory is being used and
> it is not being free up. Actually after this access to the database and
> the server is just idle
>
> The memory is still used up. I am monitoring this using the "free"
> command which gives me about 5.5 gig of used memory and the rest free.
I suppose you looked at the top row of the free output?
Because there the disk-cache is counted as "used"... Have a look at the
second row where buffers are counted as free, which they more or less are.
> Is there something that I should do to minimize and free up the used
> memory?
No, the buffers make your database faster because they reduce direct disk
access
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
I don't :)
Mit freundlichem Gruß,
Jens Schicke
--
Jens Schicke j(dot)schicke(at)asco(dot)de
asco GmbH http://www.asco.de
Mittelweg 7 Tel 0531/3906-127
38106 Braunschweig Fax 0531/3906-400
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kuba Ouhrabka | 2005-10-21 07:33:17 | Re: cached plans in plpgsql |
Previous Message | Christian Paul B. Cosinas | 2005-10-21 03:40:47 | Used Memory |