From: | Thomas F(dot)O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | nboutelier(at)hotmail(dot)com (Nick) |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Auto increment/sequence on multiple columns? |
Date: | 2004-09-11 07:35:31 |
Message-ID: | 28B0BAF0-03C5-11D9-8609-000D93AE0944@sitening.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
How does this imply one sequence? Is it guaranteed that for each value
of a, the values of b will be equivalent to all (and only) values of a?
There's plenty of flexibility within postgres for ways to use sequences.
Regardless, I think you need to have (and present) a better idea of
what you're trying to do with your data, which itself might be tedious,
but good data design will save you countless headaches down the road.
-tfo
On Sep 10, 2004, at 7:32 PM, Nick wrote:
> Is it possible to have a sequence across two columns. For example
>
> table1
> +---+---+
> | a | b |
> +---+---+
> | 1 | 1 |
> | 1 | 2 |
> | 1 | 3 |
> | 2 | 1 |
> | 2 | 2 |
> | 2 | 3 |
> | 3 | 1 |
> | 3 | 2 |
> | 3 | 3 |
> +---+---+
>
> Would I have to create a new sequence for every unique 'a' column?
> That seems pretty tedious. -Nick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-09-11 07:40:44 | Re: problems returning a resultset from a function |
Previous Message | Thomas F.O'Connell | 2004-09-11 07:29:42 | Re: Best practices for migrating a development database to a release database |