From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is anyone working on pg_dump? |
Date: | 2000-02-29 15:28:37 |
Message-ID: | 28997.951838117@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> One of the major must-fix items remaining on my to-do-for-7.0 list
> is making pg_dump smarter about the order to dump stuff in, so as
> to avoid problems like table constraints referring to not-yet-
> defined functions.
I spent a couple evenings working on this, and have made good progress;
but looking at how much I've changed and how much remains, I'm forced
to realize that this is "too big a change for beta". It requires a
major restructuring of pg_dump. Since we don't have regression tests
for pg_dump, I think the risk of breaking something is too high for
this phase of the release cycle.
I plan to set the unfinished code aside for now, and come back to it
early in the 7.1 cycle. We'll have to live with the ordering issue
for another release.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-29 16:09:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-29 14:59:17 | Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 |