From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DROP OWNED BY doesn't work |
Date: | 2006-08-20 17:56:00 |
Message-ID: | 28996.1156096560@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Sounds a pretty obvious move. This would be it then. Please note the
> changes to the ObjectAddresses stuff, mainly to not move the definition
> of struct ObjectAddresses to dependency.h but instead move only the
> typedef.
Looks pretty reasonable, except if you're going to do the latter I'd
suggest just having new_object_addresses() and free_object_addresses()
and getting rid of the init/term API for having the structs on the
stack. The latter is saving one palloc/pfree per deletion cycle, which
is a pretty silly micro-optimization really given everything else that's
going to happen to perform the delete. It was OK when there wasn't any
reason to do otherwise, but I can't see maintaining it in parallel with a
version that does the extra palloc/pfree, and especially not adding a
bool to the struct to support having both ...
Please fix that bit and apply.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-20 18:08:32 | Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-20 17:50:09 | Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-20 21:33:01 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-20 17:37:44 | Re: DROP OWNED BY doesn't work |