From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: statement_timeout affects query results fetching? |
Date: | 2015-08-08 15:13:36 |
Message-ID: | 28985.1439046816@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> writes:
> Hi everyone, I'm seeing some strange behavior and wanted to confirm it.
> When executing a query that selects a long result set, if the code
> processing the results takes its time (i.e.g more than statement_timeout),
> a timeout occurs. My expectation was that statement_timeout only affects
> query *processing*, and does not cover the frontend actually processing the
> result.
Are you using a cursor, or something like that?
libpq ordinarily absorbs the result set as fast as possible and then hands
it back to the application as one blob; the time subsequently spent by the
application looking at the blob doesn't count against statement_timeout.
As Robert says, statement_timeout *does* include time spent sending the
result set to the client, and we're not going to change that, because it
would be too hard to disentangle calculation from I/O. So if the client
isn't prompt about absorbing all the data then you have to factor that
into your setting. But it would be a slightly unusual usage pattern
AFAIK.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shay Rojansky | 2015-08-08 15:30:35 | Re: statement_timeout affects query results fetching? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-08-08 15:10:48 | Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication |