Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Richard van den Berg <richard(dot)vandenberg(at)trust-factory(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages
Date: 2005-12-07 14:48:25
Message-ID: 28937.1133966905@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-ports

Richard van den Berg <richard(dot)vandenberg(at)trust-factory(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a good reason that the official RPM on postgresql.org is not
> build with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP ? It would have been so nice if this
> would have worked. :-/

You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that
it's not their business to editorialize on the default setting.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-07 15:03:35 Re: [Mapbender-users] Re: [Freegis-list] Re: [GENERAL]
Previous Message Richard van den Berg 2005-12-07 14:44:45 Re: Character encoding and string matches

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-07 14:54:00 Re: Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-07 14:22:58 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages