Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 20:36:00
Message-ID: 2893.1112646960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe I am just dense, but the argument seems to be completely moot. PHP
> is no different than Perl or Python in this case.

Perl and Python don't have "BuildPrereq: postgresql-devel" in their rpmspecs.
PHP does.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-04-04 20:48:50 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Ying Lu 2005-04-04 20:33:37 about "allow reporting of which objects are in which tablespace"?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-04-04 20:48:50 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-04 20:32:39 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?