From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: explain output infelicity in psql |
Date: | 2009-12-10 18:19:00 |
Message-ID: | 28920.1260469140@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So you can tell a newline in the data from a wrap due to line length.
>> The need to be able to do that is not dependent on how many columns
>> there are.
> If that's really what we want then I think we're doing a terrible job of
> it. Have a look at the output of:
> select
> E'xxxxxxx\nxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\nxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> as a, 1 as b;
> How do we know from that where the linefeeds are, exactly?
It works quite nicely for me ... in HEAD that is:
regression=# select E'xxxxxxx\nxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\nxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
as a, 1 as b;
a | b
------------------------------------------------------+---
xxxxxxx +| 1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +|
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
(1 row)
regression=#
The point here is exactly that previous versions didn't show the
distinction well.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-12-10 18:19:48 | Re: Need --without-docs build switch |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-12-10 18:12:52 | Re: explain output infelicity in psql |