Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Walker <furface(at)omnicode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?
Date: 2007-01-28 03:24:07
Message-ID: 28912.1169954647@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mark Walker <furface(at)omnicode(dot)com> writes:
> I'm wondering if there's a manageable limit on the number of users in
> postgresql. I could have conceivably thousands of different users for
> any particular app and multiple apps in the same server.

Numbers in the low thousands are probably workable, as long as you
aren't adding and removing users at a great rate. I think that the
main bottleneck would be the "flat file" that's used to tell the
postmaster about the set of valid users --- every time a user is
added/dropped/changed, that file gets rewritten and then re-parsed
by the postmaster. So you could eat a lot of overhead if you change
users every few seconds or something like that.

I'd suggest doing some testing to see if there are any unexpected
bottlenecks, but I don't see a reason to reject the idea out of hand.
(If you find any slownesses, report 'em, and we might be able to fix
'em.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre Thibaudeau 2007-01-28 08:28:37 tsearch2, locale, UTF-8 and Windows
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-01-28 03:22:02 Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches