From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Walker <furface(at)omnicode(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql? |
Date: | 2007-01-28 03:24:07 |
Message-ID: | 28912.1169954647@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mark Walker <furface(at)omnicode(dot)com> writes:
> I'm wondering if there's a manageable limit on the number of users in
> postgresql. I could have conceivably thousands of different users for
> any particular app and multiple apps in the same server.
Numbers in the low thousands are probably workable, as long as you
aren't adding and removing users at a great rate. I think that the
main bottleneck would be the "flat file" that's used to tell the
postmaster about the set of valid users --- every time a user is
added/dropped/changed, that file gets rewritten and then re-parsed
by the postmaster. So you could eat a lot of overhead if you change
users every few seconds or something like that.
I'd suggest doing some testing to see if there are any unexpected
bottlenecks, but I don't see a reason to reject the idea out of hand.
(If you find any slownesses, report 'em, and we might be able to fix
'em.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre Thibaudeau | 2007-01-28 08:28:37 | tsearch2, locale, UTF-8 and Windows |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-28 03:22:02 | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |