From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> |
Cc: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1 |
Date: | 2004-05-12 21:29:55 |
Message-ID: | 28900.1084397395@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> writes:
> Ok. How about an official patch against 7.4.2 that fixes it, so that
> packagers can make their own informed decision.
The "official patch" is available to anyone who wants it from our CVS
server.
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/lib/stringinfo.c.diff?r1=1.36&r2=1.36.4.1
BTW, all the principal packagers read this list and have doubtless made
their informed decisions already ...
> Also, has anybody checked what other versions are affected?
Nothing before 7.4, at least by the known implications of this issue.
Again, if we wait a while and let Ken keep running his analysis tool,
he might turn up other stuff we need to fix. Maybe even stuff that
needs a fix much worse than this does.
>>>Industry practices dictate that we do issue SOMETHING now. The bug is
>>>now public, and can be exploited.
I frankly think that this discussion is emblematic of all the worst
tendencies of the security community. Have you forgotten the fable
about the boy who cried "wolf"? If you demand a Chinese fire drill
for every issue that could conceivably be exploited, you'll soon find
yourself unable to get peoples' attention for problems that are really
serious.
I repeat: in my estimation this is not a bug that needs a fix yesterday.
AFAICS it would be very difficult to cause more than a nuisance DOS with
it, and there are plenty of other ways for authenticated database users
to cause those.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Spraul | 2004-05-12 21:32:14 | Re: Linux 2.6.6 also |
Previous Message | Shachar Shemesh | 2004-05-12 20:36:49 | Re: Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1 |