Re: Operator class group proposal

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Operator class group proposal
Date: 2006-12-16 16:44:44
Message-ID: 2890.24.211.165.134.1166287484.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> The "superclass" term passes that test, but fails because it is somehow
> expected that you can't put a class inside a superclass.
>
> How about "hyperclass" then? :-) Maybe "school" :-D
>
> Maybe somebody should ask a philologist about a greek or latin prefix
> with that meaning.
>

I did wonder if "operator metaclass" might fit the bill ... finding a term
with meaning that is both adequate and accurate isn't easy.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-16 16:48:48 Re: Operator class group proposal
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2006-12-16 16:38:51 Re: invalid input syntax for type timestamp.