Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Date: 2010-12-10 20:33:37
Message-ID: 28895.1292013217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/10/10 12:17 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Or do we want contrib's specific version numbers that are not all the
>> same as the current PostgreSQL version number?

> I think that each contrib needs its own version numbers. The reason
> being that most minor updates don't touch contrib.

Certainly extensions that aren't part of contrib would need separate
version numbers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-10 20:34:28 Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-10 20:30:55 Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw