Re: Help understanding VACUUM info on 7.4.5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help understanding VACUUM info on 7.4.5
Date: 2005-04-01 21:48:56
Message-ID: 28891.1112392136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

"Chris White \(cjwhite\)" <cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
> Does this mean it could be any transaction, even one that has not done
> anything with large objects, but one that started prior to the large objects
> being deleted?

Exactly.

> All access to the DB is done via JDBC, so has this JDBC issue been fixed in
> 7.4.5?

You'd have to ask the JDBC guys ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Goulet, Dick 2005-04-01 21:57:30 Re: Disk Encryption - Postgresql vs. Oracle
Previous Message Joseph Brenner 2005-04-01 21:43:01 Disk Encryption - Postgresql vs. Oracle