Re: directory archive format for pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, José Arthur Benetasso Villanova <jose(dot)arthur(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: directory archive format for pg_dump
Date: 2010-11-22 17:07:03
Message-ID: 28890.1290445623@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> But I'm not actually sure we should be preventing mix & match of files
> from different dumps. It might be very useful to do just that sometimes,
> like restoring a recent backup, with the contents of one table replaced
> with older data. A warning would be ok, though.

+1. This mechanism seems like a solution in search of a problem.
Just lose the whole thing, and instead fix pg_dump to complain if
the target directory isn't empty. That should be sufficient to guard
against accidental mixing of different dumps, and as Heikki says
there's not a good reason to prevent intentional mixing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-22 17:08:24 Re: dblink versus long connection strings
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-22 17:05:58 Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)