Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a better way than going to time_t and back?
Isn't the standard SQL-level locution
timestamptz + numeric_value * '1 second'::interval
? I'm not sure what would be the most convenient realization
of this at the C level, but please stay away from time_t ...
regards, tom lane