From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Current wisdom wrt fsm on 8.0 |
Date: | 2004-10-07 15:10:49 |
Message-ID: | 28839.1097161849@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> writes:
> What is the current wisdom on setting the fsm variables
> for 8.0? How is it different from 7.4? Or is it?
Same as before.
> I am assuming these are the values that changed with
> Jan's changes. If not what were those variables?
No, I can't think of any 8.0 changes that would influence how you set
FSM size. There's been some speculation that with the new ARC code,
it might be worth increasing shared_buffers to larger values than were
useful before. I haven't seen any experiments to back that up though.
There are also some brand-new GUC variables that you can twiddle to
influence the background writer's behavior; and the existence of the
bgwriter might affect your thinking about how often checkpoints need
to occur.
pgsql-performance would probably be the most appropriate venue if you
want to discuss this more.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-10-07 15:19:18 | Re: [JDBC] Problem with boolean type |
Previous Message | ma tr | 2004-10-07 15:06:41 | unsubscription |