Re: ksqo?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ksqo?
Date: 2002-05-24 04:31:00
Message-ID: 28830.1022214660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.

Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
query, even if only subtly. But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: ksqo? at 2002-05-24 01:10:46 from Neil Conway

Responses

  • Re: ksqo? at 2002-05-29 01:47:19 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-05-24 06:25:53 Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-05-24 01:10:46 Re: ksqo?