Re: Proposal to improve uniq function documentation in intarray extension

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: martin(dot)kalcher(at)aboutsource(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to improve uniq function documentation in intarray extension
Date: 2022-06-03 17:55:52
Message-ID: 288014.1654278952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 3 Jun 2022, at 17:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> .. there's no longer any reason we have
>> to limit ourselves to one example. I propose this:

> +1

Done like that, then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jack DeVries 2022-06-03 20:18:10 Re: Fwd: Adding more detail to pg_upgrade documentation
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-06-03 17:05:57 Re: Proposal to improve uniq function documentation in intarray extension