Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Date: 2022-11-16 20:09:47
Message-ID: 287b17b8-92f3-2bc2-6bcf-31dc1305b65a@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-11-15 Tu 00:08, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 03:40:04PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Thanks for taking a look! Here is a rebased version of the patch set.
> Oops, apparently object_aclcheck() cannot be used for pg_class. Here is
> another version that uses pg_class_aclcheck() instead. I'm not sure how I
> missed this earlier.
>

OK, reading the history I think everyone is on board with expanding
AclMode from uint32 to uint64. Is that right? If so I'm intending to
commit at least the first two of these patches fairly soon.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-11-16 20:12:02 Re: Split index and table statistics into different types of stats
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-11-16 19:52:32 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)