Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> k, hasn't come through yet, but looked in the archives and the message
>> looks good ... missed a / for cvsweb, so fixed that ...
> Looks good, but one minor quibble: the URL is to the cvsweb page for the
> file in question, not the diff for the change to the file described by
> the commit message. The latter would probably be more useful, and would
> mean the diff would be easily accessible when browsing the archives. Is
> this possible?
Only if the script has access to the old and new revision numbers for
the file ... does it?
regards, tom lane