From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psql -f doesn't complain about directories |
Date: | 2007-11-15 15:44:57 |
Message-ID: | 2876.1195141497@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
>> It's not the fopen that fails, it's the fgets that returns NULL. We
>> don't subsequently check if that's due to an I/O error or EISDIR or if
>> it's an end-of-file.
> Here is a patch for this.
This seems too far removed from the scene of the crime --- I don't have
a lot of confidence that errno will still be unchanged back in the main
loop. I'd rather see the psql_error printout occur immediately after
the failed fgets call. Either that or you need to be a bit more
proactive about ensuring errno is returned undamaged.
Also, I think you overlooked the case where we get a read error after
having already loaded some data into gets_fromFile's result buffer.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-11-15 17:01:16 | Re: psql -f doesn't complain about directories |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-15 15:24:39 | Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris |