From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Allow COMMENT ON to accept an expression rather than just a string |
Date: | 2009-04-11 18:08:21 |
Message-ID: | 2875.1239473301@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2009/4/11 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>> I remember adding the TODO after a request from the user, but I have not
>> seen further requests. I have remove the item; let's see if we get any
>> further requests for it.
> I thing so this TODO point is little bit step in bad direction.
I agree with Pavel that the originally suggested use-case seems like
a poor man's substitute for a missing database facility. But Abhijit's
question about parameters reminds me that there is a use-case from the
point of view of client-side libraries. You might wish to do something
like (pseudo-code here)
execute('COMMENT ON foo IS $1', some_string);
and let the out-of-line-parameter mechanism take care of quoting and
escaping your string. This doesn't work today, and I remember having
seen complaints about that on the JDBC list. So there's a use-case at
least for allowing parameter symbols in place of string literals, if not
fully general expressions. But again, I think we'd want such a thing
across all utility statements that can take string literals, not only
COMMENT.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-04-11 18:16:53 | Re: Allow COMMENT ON to accept an expression rather than just a string |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-04-11 17:29:15 | Re: Allow COMMENT ON to accept an expression rather than just a string |