Re: table functions as fields in a select

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: max jacob <Max(dot)Jacob(at)ircam(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table functions as fields in a select
Date: 2004-08-15 18:57:23
Message-ID: 28746.1092596243@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

max jacob <Max(dot)Jacob(at)ircam(dot)fr> writes:
> does anybody know what is the forseen behavior for using a
> set returning function in the field list of a select

It's deprecated, but will work if the function uses the SFRM_ValuePerCall
API (which plpgsql does not).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-15 19:05:26 Re: (libpq) listen/notify messages are converted to lowercase and/or are case insensitive
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-15 18:54:00 Re: case insensitive search with greek characters