Re: Erroring out on parser conflicts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Erroring out on parser conflicts
Date: 2008-12-03 03:32:32
Message-ID: 28714.1228275152@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> FYI, this is going to make it hard for developers to test CVS changes
> until they get their grammar cleaned up; perhaps add a comment on how
> to disable the check?

Well, the point is that their grammar changes are broken if that check
fails, so I'm not sure what the value of "testing" a known-incorrect
grammar might be. It wouldn't necessarily act the same after being
fixed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2008-12-03 04:26:12 Re: pg_stop_backup wait bug fix
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-03 02:20:38 Re: [BUG] lo_open() makes a warning/falls to an assertion