Re: Function parameter names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function parameter names
Date: 2003-11-23 19:08:14
Message-ID: 28696.1069614494@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> Is the reason to use name at all in pg "just" about speed, or is there
> some other reason?

Peter already explained it: we like fixed-width fields in system
catalogs so that we can overlay C struct definitions onto the tuples.
This is a fairly significant notational advantage in the backend code,
whether or not you care about speed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-23 19:09:51 Re: initdb mkdir_p() doesn't work
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-23 18:56:27 Re: [7.4] statistics collector: Protocol not supported