Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?
Date: 2003-05-05 16:58:04
Message-ID: 28694.1052153884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> instead. (Or maybe 7.5, considering how close the 7.4 feature freeze
>> date is.)

> Good point. How close is it? It would be good to see this fixed in 7.4.

The target is to go beta June 1, so we need to freeze features probably
a week or two before that ... in other words, Real Soon Now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-05-05 17:58:42 Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-05 16:55:47 Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?