Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp>, postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same
Date: 2003-09-23 00:41:21
Message-ID: 28672.1064277681@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
>> Is it right for postgres to accept a foreign key constraint when the
>> type of the field is not the same as that of the foreign key?

> IIRC in SQL92 it's said that they need to be the same type, but in SQL99
> it says that the two types must be comparable. We basically implement the
> latter, basically using the existance of a usable equality operator as the
> determination of comparable.

Note however that performance may be poor with a cross-type foreign key
reference, if the planner is unable to figure out how to use an index
for the check queries.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mainlander 2003-09-23 00:45:19 TList.Sort
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-09-23 00:14:50 Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same