Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Олег Царев <zabivator(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities)
Date: 2009-05-13 14:35:33
Message-ID: 28667.1242225333@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But that leads me to a question - does the existing HashAggregate code
> make any attempt to obey work_mem?

No.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-13 14:44:30 Re: DROP TABLE vs inheritance
Previous Message aftertaf 2009-05-13 13:52:29 Re: Windows installation service