| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matt Miller" <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE |
| Date: | 2006-12-18 21:09:21 |
| Message-ID: | 28647.1166476161@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Matt Miller" <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm> writes:
> Yes, I could not at first apply to REL8_2_0 because the patch file
> wanted to patch src/backend/parser/gram.c. At that point I started over
> with a fresh REL8_2_0, ran "./configure; make", and tried the patch
> again. That's when I got a bunch of failures and fuzz. The problem
> files are:
This most likely means that you have a different version of bison
installed than was used to build the release tarballs.
> Now I have two questions. First, why does pgcluster patch derived
> files?
I suppose because they think people might not have bison installed,
but on the whole it's a pretty bad idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2006-12-18 21:20:30 | feature request for Postgresql Rule system. |
| Previous Message | Matt Miller | 2006-12-18 20:53:25 | Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-18 21:15:13 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-12-18 21:08:31 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |