Re: pgsql: Move DTK_ISODOW DTK_DOW and DTK_DOY to be type UNITS rather than

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Move DTK_ISODOW DTK_DOW and DTK_DOY to be type UNITS rather than
Date: 2015-09-06 03:02:31
Message-ID: 28642.1441508551@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Move DTK_ISODOW DTK_DOW and DTK_DOY to be type UNITS rather than
> RESERV.

Shouldn't that get back-patched? Also, what about ecpg's copy
of the code?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2015-09-06 03:11:36 pgsql: Move DTK_ISODOW DTK_DOW and DTK_DOY to be type UNITS rather
Previous Message Greg Stark 2015-09-06 02:36:22 pgsql: Move DTK_ISODOW DTK_DOW and DTK_DOY to be type UNITS rather than

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2015-09-06 03:14:43 Re: pgsql: Move DTK_ISODOW DTK_DOW and DTK_DOY to be type UNITS rather than
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-09-06 02:48:02 Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members