From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | lnd(at)hnit(dot)is, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Explain plan for 2 column index |
Date: | 2004-01-29 22:07:33 |
Message-ID: | 28616.1075414053@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
>> Index Scan using testtab_name_date_from on testtab (cost=0.00..2.01
>> rows=1 width=18)
>> Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'name1'::text)
>> Filter: ((date_from)::timestamp with time zone =
>> ('now'::text)::timestamp(6)with time zone)
> What types are the columns here? If date_from isn't timestamp with time zone,
> that might be the issue.
It clearly isn't, since we can see a coercion to timestamp with time
zone in the query. My guess is that the original SQL was
WHERE ... date_from = current_timestamp
This should be
WHERE ... date_from = localtimestamp
if timestamp without tz is the intended column datatype. Of course,
it might just be that date_from was declared as the wrong type (it
really sucks that SQL specifies "timestamp" to default to "without
time zone" ...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jack Coates | 2004-01-29 22:26:56 | Re: query optimization question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-29 22:01:05 | Re: query optimization question |