| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Carlos Villela" <carlos(at)valenti(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, python-list(at)egroups(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: PL/PySQL? |
| Date: | 2001-01-26 04:21:05 |
| Message-ID: | 28572.980482865@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Carlos Villela" <carlos(at)valenti(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> I've been taking a look in the Feature Lists / TODO Files of PostgreSQL 7.1,
> and thought "hey, why is there PL/pgSQL, Perl and TCL interpreters available
> for PostgreSQL and no Python one? That'd be a great thing for, ie, Zope!"
Go for it ;-). IIRC, someone else has been making noises about such a
thing, but no submission has showed up. Check the PG mail list archives,
join forces, produce something ...
> Any thougts? What would it take to do it? Just some PgSQL Language API
> hacking and glueing with Python's C API?
The pltcl and plperl sources should give some hints --- note that
plperl is actually a hacked-up descendant of pltcl.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Leibel | 2001-01-26 04:33:01 | Re: Connection pooling |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-26 04:07:19 | Re: Performance: Unix sockets vs. TCP/IP sockets |