From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded |
Date: | 2002-09-04 19:13:18 |
Message-ID: | 28559.1031166798@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, now I remember, only SQL functions could return sets. How about
> this:
> PL/PgSQL and C functions can now return sets, with multiple
> rows and multiple columns. You specify these functions in the
> SELECT FROM clause, similar to a table or view.
C functions have always been able to return sets too; you don't honestly
think that a SQL function can do something a C function can't, do you?
There are really two independent improvements here: one is the ability
for plpgsql functions to return sets, and the other is a group of
improvements that make it easier to use a function-returning-set,
independently of what language it's written in.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-09-04 19:53:20 | Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-04 19:01:39 | Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded |