Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?
Date: 2009-06-17 16:06:16
Message-ID: 28556.1245254776@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
> How about my last example that involved aggregate functions, where
> I surprisingly got only one result row?

Oh, you're right, now that I look closer that one is a bug. Fixed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-17 16:09:58 Re: how to cancel a query in progress
Previous Message Whit Armstrong 2009-06-17 15:56:07 Re: how to cancel a query in progress