Re: client_min_messages in dumps?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: client_min_messages in dumps?
Date: 2004-06-29 13:43:55
Message-ID: 28548.1088516635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "foo_pkey" for table "foo"
>> is conveying any useful information?

> Maybe there should be another level called NOVICE :-)

Not a bad idea --- could satisfy everybody?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2004-06-29 13:45:32 Re: Tablespace permissions issue
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-06-29 13:37:15 Re: lock timeout patch