Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target
Date: 2009-05-22 18:36:45
Message-ID: 28527.1243017405@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net writes:
> Wouldn't he just need to rerun the tests with default_stats_target set to
> the old value? I presume he has actually done this already in order to
> come to the conclusion he did about the cause of the regression.

Yeah, he did, so we know it's slower that way. But exactly *why* it's
slower is not proven. It could be an artifact rather than something
we really ought to react to.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-22 18:38:20 Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target
Previous Message andrew 2009-05-22 17:57:05 Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target