Re: Update on Supporting Encryption in Postgresql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Murat Kantarcioglu <kanmurat(at)cs(dot)purdue(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on Supporting Encryption in Postgresql
Date: 2004-09-10 19:11:37
Message-ID: 28511.1094843497@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Murat Kantarcioglu <kanmurat(at)cs(dot)purdue(dot)edu> writes:
> This piece will be a part of a bigger design and the problems
> mentioned are very real. In the future, our goal is to design a database
> system where the processing is done in a "secure coprocessor"(i.e no one
> will be able to see what is inside) and
> the small code inside the co-processor is verified using formal methods.

[ raised eyebrow... ] You think a SQL database is small code you can
verify using formal methods? I don't really see how you can expect that
the decrypted data can be held entirely within a small secured area and
still get any useful work done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Murat Kantarcioglu 2004-09-10 19:25:54 Re: Update on Supporting Encryption in Postgresql
Previous Message Murat Kantarcioglu 2004-09-10 19:08:16 Re: Update on Supporting Encryption in Postgresql