From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
Date: | 2014-05-01 22:08:55 |
Message-ID: | 28507.1398982135@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There's another problematic case:
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=olinguito&dt=2014-05-01%2021%3A22%3A43&stg=config
> /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.14.0: warning: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy()
> /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.14.0: warning: strcat() is almost always misused, please use strlcat()
> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.3.8: warning: sprintf() is often misused, please use snprintf()
> That's not new. And it seems like a case of really misguided platform
> specific changes (actually smelling a bit of zealotry). So I'd be
> prepared to ignore it. Other opinions?
Yeah, I've noticed those before, and concluded that "misguided zealotry"
is the appropriate classification. I certainly won't do anything about
those. (These particular ones, we *can't* do anything about, since the
calls are inside libraries we don't control the source of...)
> How on earth could it be a good idea to warn about this when linking to
> libraries instead of warning when a function is actually used during
> compilation?
Not only misguided, but crappily implemented zealotry.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-05-01 23:43:45 | Re: Obsolete coding in fork_process.c |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-01 21:59:08 | Re: Obsolete coding in fork_process.c |