| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
| Date: | 2014-05-01 22:08:55 |
| Message-ID: | 28507.1398982135@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There's another problematic case:
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=olinguito&dt=2014-05-01%2021%3A22%3A43&stg=config
> /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.14.0: warning: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy()
> /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.14.0: warning: strcat() is almost always misused, please use strlcat()
> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.3.8: warning: sprintf() is often misused, please use snprintf()
> That's not new. And it seems like a case of really misguided platform
> specific changes (actually smelling a bit of zealotry). So I'd be
> prepared to ignore it. Other opinions?
Yeah, I've noticed those before, and concluded that "misguided zealotry"
is the appropriate classification. I certainly won't do anything about
those. (These particular ones, we *can't* do anything about, since the
calls are inside libraries we don't control the source of...)
> How on earth could it be a good idea to warn about this when linking to
> libraries instead of warning when a function is actually used during
> compilation?
Not only misguided, but crappily implemented zealotry.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-05-01 23:43:45 | Re: Obsolete coding in fork_process.c |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-01 21:59:08 | Re: Obsolete coding in fork_process.c |