From: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution |
Date: | 2017-11-20 19:45:48 |
Message-ID: | 284aea2f-aebb-aa22-ddb4-f7e0a4fe0575@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
El 09/11/17 a las 09:29, Arthur Zakirov escribió:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:49:17PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
>> Updated patch with documentation of the new option.
>>
>
> I have checked the patch.
> The patch is applied and compiled correctly without any errors. Tests passed.
> The documentation doesn't have errors too.
>
>
> I have a little suggestion. Maybe insert new line without any additional parameters? We can check that stderr is not terminal using isatty().
>
> The code could become:
>
> if (!isatty(fileno(stderr)))
> fprintf(stderr, "\n");
> else
> fprintf(stderr, "\r");
>
> Also it could be good to not insert new line after progress:
>
> if (showprogress)
> {
> progress_report(PQntuples(res), NULL, true);
> /* if (!batchmode) */
> /* or */
> if (isatty(fileno(stderr)))
> fprintf(stderr, "\n"); /* Need to move to next line */
> }
New version of patch, without the --batch-mode option and using isatty()
I send in a separate thread a proposal to make isatty() be defined as
_isatty() in windows.
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_basebackup-using-isatty.patch | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-20 19:53:24 | Re: Using isatty() on WIN32 platform |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-20 19:18:45 | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |