Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables
Date: 2018-01-18 09:28:14
Message-ID: 284a5db7-0c0b-9064-95cb-769bd83bb2ef@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/01/17 22:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm setting this patch to Returned with feedback.

OK. Sorry that I couldn't reply here since the CF started. I have
written some code to implement the pg_partition_root() idea you mentioned
upthread earlier this week, but hasn't been able to share it on the list
yet. I will post it soon and create a new entry in the next commit fest.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marina Polyakova 2018-01-18 09:53:19 Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2018-01-18 09:06:40 Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench