| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG |
| Date: | 2010-02-26 16:14:01 |
| Message-ID: | 28484.1267200841@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:12:10PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> Michael, can we try to install the first two patches?
> If I understood the rest of the thread correctly this is not needed anymore,
> right?
I think it would be a good idea, just to have all that code using
identical #includes. Rmi's problem may be a platform bug rather
than something we can fix ourselves, but I think that making sure that
ecpg uses the exact same coding that's been proven in the backend
will forestall problems on other platforms.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Garick Hamlin | 2010-02-26 16:26:23 | pgbouncer + psql 9.0a4 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-26 16:11:31 | Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG |