From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Explain docs and the regression database |
Date: | 2010-05-30 03:37:40 |
Message-ID: | 28482.1275190660@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The introduction to using EXPLAIN:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/using-explain.html
> includes a footnote at the bottom suggesting you might follow along with
> these examples because they come from the regression test database.
> This would really be a lot more useful if it gave some sort of clue just
> how exactly a user might get that database populated with that
> regression data.
You run the regression tests.
> I'm not even quite sure myself exactly what point in
> the regression testing cycle these examples came from.
The ending state.
> Another open
> question in my head is whether enough pieces of the regression set are
> shipped in the most common packaging sets that it's ever practical to
> expect users to run the tests at all. Thoughts?
In Fedora/RHEL, and I believe also the PGDG RPMs, you'd install the
postgresql-test RPM and run it per directions.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-30 16:57:52 | Re: Change to kernel-resources |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-30 02:36:46 | Re: Change to kernel-resources |