Re: SSI atomic commit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI atomic commit
Date: 2011-07-07 20:24:55
Message-ID: 28477.1310070295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> That yields a much smaller patch (attached). How does this look to
>> you, am I missing anything?

> Very clever. I'll need to study this and think about it. I'll try
> to post a response before I go to bed tonight. Hopefully Dan can
> weigh in, too. (I know he was traveling with limited Internet
> access -- not sure about his return date.)

Just so everybody's clear --- this isn't making beta3, if it's not going
to get committed today.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-07-07 20:33:36 Re: SSI atomic commit
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2011-07-07 20:24:07 Re: Creating temp tables inside read only transactions