Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Someone asked me a question about view and function permissions. I
> assumed all object access done by a view would be based on the
> permissions on the view, and not the permissions of the objects.
Table references are checked according to the owner of the view, but use
in a view does not change the execution context for function or operator
calls. This is how it's always been done.
> Is this a bug?
Changing it would be a major definitional change (and a pretty major
implementation change too). It might be better, but please don't
pre-judge the issue by labeling it a bug.
regards, tom lane