Re: SIGPIPE handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SIGPIPE handling
Date: 2003-11-16 17:04:42
Message-ID: 28476.1069002282@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is running the rest of the
> application with SIGPIPE <= SIG_IGN a problem?

That is NOT an acceptable thing for a library to do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Spraul 2003-11-16 17:08:22 Re: SIGPIPE handling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-16 16:58:12 Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code