From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
Date: | 2021-01-30 01:53:49 |
Message-ID: | 2847014.1611971629@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 4:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We do still have x86 in the buildfarm, as well as some other
>> 32-bit platforms, so I don't agree that it's that much less
>> tested than non-mainstream 64-bit platforms.
> I don't know anybody that still runs Postgres
> (or anything like it) on a 32-bit platform. I think that Michael
> Paquier owns a Raspberry Pi zero, but that hardly counts.
Hmph ... three of my five buildfarm animals are 32-bit, plus I
have got 32-bit OSes for my Raspberry Pi ;-). Admittedly, none
of those represent hardware someone would put a serious database
on today. But in terms of testing diversity, I think they're
a lot more credible than thirty-one flavors of Linux on x86_64.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-01-30 02:02:11 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-01-30 01:47:56 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |