From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? |
Date: | 2008-10-06 23:02:15 |
Message-ID: | 28443.1223334135@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> When I was looking at this code for the first time recently I thought the
> same thing Tom did here--that this was kind of odd and it should give a
> text array back instead. I would even volunteer to take a stab at writing
> that change myself just to get some more practice with this section of
> code, should be able to squeeze that in over the next month.
Fine with me, but let's be sure this doesn't slide off the radar screen.
If we forget about it and release 8.4 with the current definition of the
column, it'll be too late to change it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-07 00:39:15 | Re: Common Table Expressions applied; some issues remain |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-06 22:57:35 | Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-10-06 23:17:56 | Re: Fwd: Supporters of Gin index |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-10-06 23:00:01 | Re: Fwd: Supporters of Gin index |