| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm) |
| Date: | 2009-10-03 17:40:50 |
| Message-ID: | 2844.1254591650@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> OK, the reason I couldn't reproduce this for the life of me is that I
> had PGCLIENTENCODING=UTF8 in the environment of the server(!). Once I
> unset that, I could reproduce the problem. This could be made a bit
> more well-defined if we ran pg_regress with --multibyte=something,
> although that is then liable to fail in encodings that don't have an
> equivalent of \u0080. Some with your suggestion above: It will only
> work for some encodings.
I'm back to wondering why we need a regression test for this at all.
Wouldn't it be just as useful to be testing a character code that
is well-defined everywhere? Or just drop this test altogether?
It's already got way too many expected files for my taste.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-10-03 23:11:32 | Re: Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-10-03 17:37:37 | Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm) |