Re: pl/pgsql and arrays[]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql and arrays[]
Date: 2011-12-05 16:11:01
Message-ID: 28437.1323101461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> return next in function that returns composite type needs a composite
> variable. Other cases are not supported there.

Plain "return" has the same limitation, but this really ought to be
fixed sometime. Composite types have been getting closer and closer
to first-class status since plpgsql was written.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 2011-12-05 16:41:41 Re: What's the best way in Postgres9 to store a bunch of arbitrary boolean values for a row?
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2011-12-05 16:02:13 Re: pg_standby: How to check in which state the server is currently?